Featured Story

Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against the College Entrance Examination Board Over Advanced Placement Testing

On Tuesday, May 19, 百姓彩票网, a class action lawsuit was filed against the College Entrance Examination Board ("College Board") in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of high school students who took Advanced Placement ("AP") testing online as a result of the shift to distance learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Read More.

Recently Featured Dockets

Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH et al v. ROSS Intelligence Inc. (filed 5/6/20)
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware

Martinko et al v. Whitmer (filed 4/14/20)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Wendy Gish et al v. Gavin Newsom et al (filed 4/13/20)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Abiding Place Ministries v. Wooten et al (filed 4/9/20)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Other Legal News

SCOTUSblog, June 1, 百姓彩票网

In a narrow, textualist decision, the Supreme Court today agreed with Nidal Khalid Nasrallah that a federal court of appeals has jurisdiction to review, albeit deferentially, the factual basis of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his claim that he qualifies for protection under the Convention Against Torture. Nasrallah sought the United States’ protection…

SCOTUSblog, June 1, 百姓彩票网

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held in Thole v. U.S. Bank that participants and beneficiaries in defined-benefit plans do not have the legal right, known as standing, to assert fiduciary breach claims, at least in the absence of catastrophic plan and sponsor failure. James Thole and Sherry Smith, retirees from U.S. Bank, alleged…

The New York Times, June 1, 百姓彩票网

The case concerned the constitutionality of appointments to a government board charged with restructuring billions of dollars of debt.

The New York Times, June 1, 百姓彩票网

Judges in Harris County, Texas, were far more likely to appoint lawyers who had donated to their campaigns to represent poor criminal defendants.

The Things That Are Caesar’s
Justia's Verdict, May 20, 百姓彩票网

Cornell law professor Sherry F. Colb comments on the recent oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court in Our Lady of Gaudalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, which raises the question how broadly to construe the word “minister” within the ministerial exception to anti-discrimination law required by the First Amendment. Colb explains where the ministerial exception doctrine might be headed and suggests that an exemption even for criminal misconduct against ministers might be within the existing doctrine.

Supreme Court of the United States, May 5, 百姓彩票网